Profile

themidnightgirl: (Default)
Zoƫ

July 2021

S M T W T F S
    123
45678 910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Date: 2004-03-18 02:47 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] andrewwyld.livejournal.com
He was a staunch economic libertarian, advocated minimum taxation on large businesses (preferring village pillage instead -- for the rhyme-scheme) and was eventually imprisoned for insider trading.
Date: 2004-03-18 02:48 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] borusa.livejournal.com
But what was his view on the Euro?
Date: 2004-03-18 02:52 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] andrewwyld.livejournal.com
He was only asked once.

The reply was politically inconclusive, but sufficiently conclusive in other ways that nobody ever did get round to finding out what he thought on the subject.
Date: 2004-03-18 02:57 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Slightly to the left of me, I believe.

Of course, Kublai was the smart one.
Date: 2004-03-18 03:19 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] winterthing.livejournal.com
He was highly pro-immigration I believe. Mostly him immigrating to other people's countries and taking their benefits - like land, food, the right to breathe etc.
Date: 2004-03-18 04:35 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] ua-meruti.livejournal.com
Ah he was just misunderstood
Date: 2004-03-18 08:23 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] smhwpf.livejournal.com
Darn, I was reading about this just the other day - can't remember exactly where.

Thing is, he wasn't just into mass conquest, he was into the mass slaughter of the conquered. There was one city where the defenders were so totally overwhelmed by the force of the Mongol attack that he could just allocate a fairly small number of his warriors to execute the entire population.

I expect many right-wingers might balk at the classification of such policies as 'right-wing', but I'm quite happy with it. :)
Date: 2004-03-19 01:59 am (UTC)

From: [identity profile] mirabehn.livejournal.com
*giggles*

Tut, Sam. You're absolutely shameless. There are lots of lovely right-wingers out there. My in-laws for instance, are perfectly lovely. :)

Nevertheless.

*giggles*
Date: 2004-03-19 01:06 am (UTC)

From: [identity profile] jonnyargles.livejournal.com
Well, I guess he was in favour of the state controlling everything, so long as he was the state. I don't think he'd have supported healthy competition from other barbarian invaders, or allowed himself to be subject to independent market forces.
Date: 2004-03-19 12:39 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] robert-jones.livejournal.com
I'm not sure. I think he would have taken it for granted that in a fully open competition he would be universally triumphant, and therefore he would be all in favour of tearing down all barriers to free movement of goods, services, labour and barbarian hordes.
Date: 2004-03-20 06:16 am (UTC)

From: [identity profile] neonchameleon.livejournal.com
He was definintely in favour of redistribution of wealth from the rich to the homeless. I'd call that pretty left wing, myself.
Page generated Jan. 3rd, 2026 01:07 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios